Talk:Analytics/AQS/Wikistats 2/DataQuality/VettingPerProjectFamilies

Some suggestions:

Let's be specific with dates, what date this the vetting happen and with what snapshot was it calculated
Let's define what we are talking about when we say project families and possibly link to announcement in wikitech
Let's explain why "mediawiki" might not be a project family
Let's outline the metrics we are vetting and let's link to the wikistats pages in meta, if metrics are not available let's have a section explicitly about that and possibly link to the tickets in question
Let's have a summary section that "sums up" findings so people do not need to read the whole report to get an idea of the expected differences.

Graphs:

Edits: early numbers before 2002 distort graph, let's make one graph for "before 2002" and after. Dig a little to see why differences are so big, I thought data did not go so far? Ditto for "Total article count" we need two graphs, one that explores when differences were big and a second one.

Please label Y axis with "difference as a percentage " should be clear how is percentage calculated is wikistats1 always higher or is wikistats2 higher? Y label should be the same on all graphs. Right now labels are different per graph.

Let's link to wikistats metric pages so it is clear what metrics are we talking about